A Joint Model of Implicit Arguments for Nominal Predicates
نویسندگان
چکیده
Many prior studies have investigated the recovery of semantic arguments for nominal predicates. The models in many of these studies have assumed that arguments are independent of each other. This assumption simplifies the computational modeling of semantic arguments, but it ignores the joint nature of natural language. This paper presents a preliminary investigation into the joint modeling of implicit arguments for nominal predicates. The joint model uses propositional knowledge extracted from millions of Internet webpages to help guide prediction.
منابع مشابه
Semantic Role Labeling of Implicit Arguments for Nominal Predicates
Nominal predicates often carry implicit arguments. Recent work on semantic role labeling has focused on identifying arguments within the local context of a predicate; implicit arguments, however, have not been systematically examined. To address this limitation, we have manually annotated a corpus of implicit arguments for ten predicates from NomBank. Through analysis of this corpus, we find th...
متن کاملBeyond NomBank: A Study of Implicit Arguments for Nominal Predicates
Despite its substantial coverage, NomBank does not account for all withinsentence arguments and ignores extrasentential arguments altogether. These arguments, which we call implicit, are important to semantic processing, and their recovery could potentially benefit many NLP applications. We present a study of implicit arguments for a select group of frequent nominal predicates. We show that imp...
متن کاملSEMANTIC ROLE LABELING OF IMPLICIT ARGUMENTS FOR NOMINAL PREDICATES By
SEMANTIC ROLE LABELING OF IMPLICIT ARGUMENTS FOR NOMINAL PREDICATES
متن کاملCan Selectional Preferences Help Automatic Semantic Role Labeling?
We describe a topic model based approach for selectional preference. Using the topic features generated by an LDA model on the extracted predicate-arguments over the Chinese Gigaword corpus, we show improvement to our state-of-the-art Chinese SRL system by 2.34 F1 points on arguments of nominal predicates, 0.40 F1 point on arguments of verb predicates, and 0.66 F1 point overall. More over, simi...
متن کاملCoping With Implicit Arguments And Events Coreference
In this paper we present ongoing work for the creation of a linguistically-based system for event coreference. We assume that this task requires deep understanding of text and that statistically-based methods, both supervised and unsupervised are inadequate. The reason for this choice is due to the fact that event coreference can only take place whenever argumenthood is properly computed. It is...
متن کامل